MEO的目的是傳播關于醫生和其他衛生保健專業人員教育和培訓的信息。將考慮出版關于教育和培訓衛生專業人員過程中任何方面的手稿。有關但不限于以下研究范疇的論文值得關注:?基礎科學教育?臨床科學教育?教育實習?學習理論?基于問題的學習(PBL)?課程開發?研究設計和統計?測量和評估?教師發展?信息/網絡MEO出版社論、原創文章、評論文章、給編輯的信和書評。MEO出版三大類原創文章:專題文章-包括討論健康教育社區普遍關心的問題的文章。例如(但不限于)對特定主題的文獻提出觀點、評論和評論。除了被邀請的文章和社論外，專題文章都是經過同行評審的。研究論文-提供高質量的已完成的研究或評估研究。研究論文由同行評審。趨勢文章-提出新的想法，以及研究或描述在開發的早期階段的計劃。趨勢文章被設想為一種快速傳播創新思想、描述新項目以及研究和評估研究的初步結果的方法。提交給本節的稿件將經過同行評審。在評審過程中，提交材料的初步性質將被考慮進去，盡管對新項目的描述至少要有一定程度的形成性評價數據。

The aims of MEO is to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts on any aspect of the process of educating and training health professionals will be considered for publication. Papers dealing with but not limited to the following research areas are of interest:? Basic science education? Clinical science education? Residency education? Learning theory? Problem-based learning (PBL)? Curriculum development? Research design and statistics? Measurement and evaluation? Faculty development? Informatics/webMEO publishes Editorials, Original articles, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, and Book reviews.MEO publishes three general categories of ORIGINAL ARTICLES:Feature Articles - include articles discussing issues of general interest to the health education community. For example (but not limited to) presenting perspectives as well as reviews and commentary of the literature on a specific topic. With the exception of invited articles and editorials, feature articles are peer-reviewed.Research Articles - present high quality completed research or evaluation studies. Research articles are peer-reviewed.Trend Articles - present new ideas as well as studies or descriptions of programs in the early stages of development. Trend articles are envisioned as a means of quickly disseminating innovative ideas, descriptions of new programs and preliminary results from research and evaluation studies. Manuscripts submitted to this section are peer-reviewed. The preliminary nature of the material submitted will be taken into account in the review process though descriptions of new programs are expected to have at least some minimal level of formative evaluation data.